A crypto, stablecoin or payments firm needs a state money transmitter licence in every state where it receives money or monetary value from a person in that state and promises to make it available somewhere else or later, unless a specific exemption applies. Many states expressly include virtual currency or reserve-backed stablecoins in that definition. In the first two months of 2026 alone, Georgia made final a cease and desist order against an unlicensed online virtual currency platform and Texas fined a kiosk operator for selling stablecoin without a licence. The federal offence of running an unlicensed money transmitting business, 18 U.S.C. 1960, applies on top.
This guide explains when the licensing requirement is triggered, what regulators did in 2026, and how to put the position right before an examiner, a licensing reviewer or a partner bank asks.
What counts as money transmission
There is no single national definition. Each state defines money transmission in its own statute, and 31 states had enacted the CSBS Money Transmission Modernization Act (MTMA) in full or in part as at September 2026, which has brought the wording closer together. The core test in most states has two parts:
- Receiving money or monetary value from a person in the state
- A promise to make that money or value available at a later time or a different place, or to send it on to someone else
The Texas Department of Banking described this test in its February 2026 order: money transmission services mean the receipt of money or monetary value by any means and a reciprocal promise to make money or monetary value available at a later time or different location. Texas law defines money transmission to include receiving money for transmission from a person located in Texas, which means an out-of-state or online business is caught where its customer is in the state.
At federal level, a money transmitter must register with FinCEN as a money services business regardless of transaction size. Registration does not authorise transmission. 18 U.S.C. 1960 makes it a crime to run a money transmitting business without a required state licence, without FinCEN registration, or that moves funds known to come from crime.
Does crypto and stablecoin activity count?
In many states, yes. The table shows how three state regimes have treated it in 2026.
| State | How digital assets are treated | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Texas | Money or monetary value includes a stablecoin pegged to a sovereign currency, fully backed by reserve assets and redeemable at the issuer for that currency | Texas Finance Code section 152.003, cited in Order No. 2026-001 |
| Georgia | No person may transmit money or monetary value, including virtual currency, without a licence or a statutory exemption | Georgia Department of Banking and Finance, 16 January 2026 |
| California | A separate digital financial assets licence. From 1 July 2026 companies must be licensed by the DFPI or have applied | California DFPI, Digital Financial Assets Law |
The NMLS data shows how few crypto firms report as licensed money transmitters. According to the NMLS 2024 Money Services Businesses Report, 149 companies in NMLS carried on virtual currency exchanging and trading, but only 15 reported virtual currency exchange and transmission volume on the MSB Call Report, totalling about USD 65.3 billion.
Activities that commonly trigger licensing include buying and selling virtual currency for customers, custodial wallets that hold customer value, crypto kiosks, stablecoin purchase and redemption for customers, and fiat on-ramps and off-ramps. Purely non-custodial software, where the firm never controls customer value, is treated differently in many states, but the analysis turns on the facts and on each state's wording.
Stablecoins and the GENIUS Act
The GENIUS Act, signed on 18 July 2025, takes effect on 18 January 2027, unless federal regulators issue final implementing rules earlier, in which case it takes effect 120 days after those rules. It creates a licensing regime for payment stablecoin issuers, with a federal route and a state-qualified route. From 18 July 2028 it will be unlawful for a digital asset service provider to offer or sell to a person in the United States a payment stablecoin not issued by a permitted issuer.
Firms that buy, sell, hold or transfer stablecoins for customers should not assume the Act replaces state money transmission licensing for their own activity. The Texas order shows a state treating sales of a reserve-backed stablecoin as money transmission under existing state law. For licensed firms holding stablecoins, the CSBS March 2026 guidance on tangible net worth confirms that on-balance-sheet, fiat-backed stablecoins redeemable at par count as tangible assets.
What state regulators did in 2026
| Date | Regulator | Firm | What the regulator found | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 January 2026 | Georgia Department of Banking and Finance | Virtual Assets LLC, trading as Crypto Dispensers | Money transmission through an online virtual currency trading platform in Georgia without a licence or exemption | Cease and desist order became final |
| 9 February 2026 | Washington Department of Financial Institutions | CoinZoom, Inc. (a licensed firm) | Net worth shortfall, late and inconsistent call reports, unreported adverse actions, bond records | Licence surrender, three-year industry ban, USD 150,000 fine with USD 50,000 stayed |
| 24 February 2026 | Texas Department of Banking | GPD Holdings LLC, trading as CoinFlip | An affiliate sold stablecoin to Texas customers through an online trading desk from February 2024 to October 2025 without a licence | Administrative penalty of USD 40,839.75 and an order not to transmit until licensed |
The firms neither admitted nor denied the findings in the consent orders. The Georgia order, the Washington order and the Texas order are published by each regulator.
Two lessons stand out. First, the Texas matter was found by the regulator while it reviewed the firm's own licence application, filed in May 2024. A licence application is a full disclosure exercise, and activity outside the perimeter tends to surface during it. Second, CoinFlip had already entered a 2023 Texas consent order for unlicensed stablecoin transactions through its kiosks, with a USD 31,600 penalty. A second matter cost more.
The Washington order shows that holding a licence is the start, not the end. Licensed firms are expected to keep net worth, bonds and reporting in order; our guides to the NMLS annual renewal and the MSB Call Report cover those duties.
Federal exposure for online and overseas firms
State licensing is only half of the picture. Three federal points apply to crypto and payments firms serving US customers from anywhere:
- No size threshold for money transmitters. FinCEN's USD 1,000 per person per day threshold applies to some money services categories, such as currency exchange, but not to money transmission. A single transfer can bring a business within the definition.
- Foreign-located businesses must register. A business outside the United States doing business wholly or in substantial part in the United States as a money services business must register with FinCEN, appoint a US agent to accept legal process and keep its records available, under 31 C.F.R. 1022.380.
- Registration must be kept current. Form 107 is renewed every two calendar years and refiled within 180 days of certain ownership changes. A lapsed registration is itself a ground under 18 U.S.C. 1960.
FinCEN counted approximately 24,856 active money services business principals at the end of 2025. Registration with FinCEN is quick and free; it is the state licences, each with its own net worth, surety bond and permissible investment rules, that take time. That is why the state perimeter should be settled before customers are onboarded, not after.
How unlicensed activity usually comes to light
- A licence application. Applicants describe their business, affiliates and history. Regulators compare that with what the firm has already been doing in the state.
- Customer complaints. A complaint to a state regulator about a lost or delayed transfer prompts the question of who was licensed to make it.
- Partner banks and payment partners. Banks that hold customer funds for money transmission firms ask for licence evidence at onboarding and at periodic review, and a gap can end the relationship.
- Examinations of a licensed affiliate or partner. Examiners follow flows of funds to related companies, as the Texas affiliate matter shows.
- Investors and acquirers. Due diligence before a funding round or acquisition tests licensing state by state.
How to regularise before someone asks
The aim is to stop the exposure growing, establish the facts and choose a lawful route in each state. The usual sequence is:
- Map the activity by state. Identify where customers are located, what the firm receives from them, who controls the funds and when the obligation ends.
- Analyse each state's definition and exemptions. Agent-of-payee, payroll and other exemptions differ, and some states will confirm an exemption on request.
- Restrict or stop the activity in states where a licence is needed and none is held, for example by blocking new customers from that state or moving the regulated step to a licensed partner.
- Choose the route in each state, using the options below.
- Register with FinCEN if not already registered, and bring the anti-money laundering programme up to the standard in 31 C.F.R. 1022.210.
- Prepare full and accurate disclosure for the licence applications. Regulators expect candour about past activity, and the orders above show inconsistent accounts are treated more seriously than the original gap.
| Route | When it fits | Main constraint |
|---|---|---|
| Stop or restrict in the state | Low volume or low strategic value in that state | Loses customers while a licence is obtained |
| Operate as an authorised delegate (agent) of a licensed transmitter | The model allows the licensee to take responsibility for the transmission | Dependence on the partner and its terms |
| Confirm an exemption with the regulator | The activity appears to fall within a statutory exemption | The answer is state-specific and can take time |
| Apply for the licence with disclosure | The state is commercially important | Months of review, net worth, bond and permissible investment requirements |
Regulatory Counsel advises crypto, stablecoin and payment firms on state perimeter analysis and multistate US money transmitter licence programmes through its licensing service, and supports licensed firms through ongoing compliance support. Our cryptoassets and money services businesses pages set out the wider regimes.
Frequently asked questions
Often, yes. Where an exchange receives money or virtual currency from customers in a state and promises to deliver value later or elsewhere, many states treat that as money transmission. Some states, such as Texas and Georgia, expressly bring stablecoins or virtual currency into the definition, and California requires a separate digital financial assets licence from 1 July 2026. The answer depends on each state's statute and exemptions.
No. FinCEN registration is a federal anti-money laundering registration and does not authorise money transmission. A business must also hold a licence in each state where it does money transmission, unless an exemption applies. 18 U.S.C. 1960 makes operating without a required state licence a federal crime.
The GENIUS Act, effective 18 January 2027, regulates payment stablecoin issuers through federal and state-qualified routes. Firms that buy, sell, hold or transfer stablecoins for customers should not assume it removes state money transmission licensing for their own activity. Texas has treated sales of reserve-backed stablecoin as money transmission under existing state law.
In February 2026 Texas imposed a USD 40,839.75 administrative penalty on a kiosk operator whose affiliate sold stablecoin to Texas customers without a licence, following an earlier USD 31,600 penalty in 2023. In January 2026 Georgia made final a cease and desist order against an unlicensed online virtual currency platform.
Generally not in that state. Most states prohibit money transmission until the licence is granted, unless the firm acts as an authorised delegate of a licensee or qualifies for an exemption. The Texas order in 2026 required the firm to keep pursuing its licence and not transmit until licensed.
Licence applications ask about the business, affiliates and regulatory history, and regulators compare the answers with what the firm has been doing. Accurate, complete disclosure is expected. Inconsistent or incomplete accounts tend to be treated more seriously than the original licensing gap.
References
- Texas Department of Banking: Order No. 2026-001, GPD Holdings LLC dba CoinFlip
- Georgia Department of Banking and Finance: Crypto Dispensers cease and desist order
- Georgia Department of Banking and Finance: press release, 16 January 2026
- Washington DFI: CoinZoom, Inc. consent order, 9 February 2026
- California DFPI: Digital Financial Assets Law
- GENIUS Act, Public Law 119-27
- CSBS: Money Transmission Modernization Act
- CSBS: MTMA guidance on stablecoin tangibility, March 2026
- NMLS: 2024 Money Services Businesses Report
- 18 U.S.C. 1960: prohibition of unlicensed money transmitting businesses
- 31 C.F.R. 1022.380: registration of money services businesses
- 31 C.F.R. 1022.210: AML programme requirements for money services businesses
About Regulatory Counsel
Regulatory Counsel advises crypto, stablecoin and payment firms on whether their activity is money transmission in each state, and manages the route to a lawful position, from exemption requests to multistate licence applications and FinCEN registration. Every enquiry is answered the same business day with a written proposal: contact us.
This article is general information as at 20 October 2026 and is not legal advice.
Definitive guides on this topic
The permanent reference pages this article relates to.